Artificial Intelligence in design is changing approaches to creating website designs and applications. Automating design with neural networks is not just a trend but a competitive advantage for companies looking to save time, achieve predictable results, and quickly adapt to market demands.
In this article, I will share our experience of using neural networks for interfaces, discuss the five best platforms we at BUSINESS SITE have implemented in projects for clients from Ukraine, such as “Nova Poshta,” “Rozetka,” “Prom.ua,” and others. You will learn how to choose the right tool, what advantages neural networks bring for UX design, and what is important to consider when integrating AI design into corporate processes.
Selection/Assessment Criteria

At BUSINESS SITE, when selecting neural networks for UI/UX, we focus on five key criteria:
- Reliability and Accuracy of Algorithms: Generative design and site redesign should be not only fast but also meet high usability standards. We evaluate how capable the neural network is in creating layouts that meet user expectations and business goals.
- Automation Capabilities of UX Processes: It is important that the tool allows automating routine tasks—from prototype generation to user scenario analysis. This saves time for the team and the client.
- Innovation and Relevance: For us, it is crucial to use solutions that meet the trends of 2025—support for generative design, integration with modern marketing platforms, and the ability to work with big data.
- Availability of UX Analytics: The best neural networks for interfaces provide tools for collecting, visualizing, and analyzing user behavior data, allowing for decision-making based on facts rather than intuition.
- User Interface Optimization: We always check how AI helps make the interface more convenient and understandable for the end-user, especially when it comes to highly competitive services like “PrivatBank” or “Monobank”.
Craftum AI

Craftum AI has become one of the leading neural tools for designers over the years. It allows creating UI/UX using neural networks in just minutes: you simply need to describe the task in text or upload references, and the system will offer ready-made layouts, color schemes, even icons, and fonts. At BUSINESS SITE, we used Craftum AI for quick prototyping of landing pages for e-commerce projects, where speed to launch and the ability to quickly test hypotheses is crucial.
Pros and Cons of Craftum AI

The advantages of Craftum AI include:
- High speed of generating layouts and design concepts.
- Flexibility in settings: you can specify style, color palette, typography.
- The ability to integrate with other services for further layout automation.
However, there are also cons:
- It is not always possible to achieve a completely unique design without manual refinement.
- For complex projects with many user scenarios, additional UX analytics are required, which Craftum AI partially implements for now.
Who is Craftum AI Suitable For

Craftum AI is perfect for designers, developers, and marketers who need to quickly launch MVPs or test new ideas. This tool is especially effective for small and medium businesses and startups where speed and flexibility are critical. We recommend using Craftum AI to generate initial concepts and then refine them considering the specifics of the Ukrainian market and user habits.
Uizard

Uizard is one of the most innovative platforms using generative adversarial networks (GAN) to create interfaces. This means the system can not only generate layouts based on text descriptions but also analyze user experience, suggest improvements based on big data, and the behavior of real users.
Pros and Cons of Uizard

Uizard has several advantages:
- Automation of UX processes: from generating wireframes to testing scenarios.
- Possibility of collaborative work in a team: designers, marketers, and developers can make edits simultaneously.
- Flexible integration with other analytics and testing tools.
But there are also limitations:
- For complex corporate solutions, there may be a lack of depth in customization.
- Some functions are only available in the paid version, which could be critical for small teams.
Who is Uizard Suitable For

Uizard is ideal for UX analysts, interface designers, and product teams who value speed and creativity. We recommend this tool for companies that want to quickly test hypotheses, launch A/B tests, and collect data on user behavior without large development costs.
Framer

Framer is a platform actively integrating machine learning into design. This allows creating personalized interfaces that adapt to user behavior and preferences. For example, for internet banking similar to “PrivatBank” or “Monobank,” Framer helps build interfaces that adjust to specific client scenarios.
Pros and Cons of Framer

Advantages of Framer:
- Deep personalization: the interface becomes maximally user-centered.
- Ability to integrate with external data sources — for example, with a CRM or analytics.
- High speed of iterations and testing.
But there are also downsides:
- The learning curve for new users is higher than other platforms.
- Integrating complex business logic requires experience with API.
Who is Framer Suitable For

Framer is a choice for companies focused on innovation and ready to invest in creating unique user scenarios. It is especially useful for digital agencies, startups, and large e-commerce projects where personalization and interface flexibility are important.
Figma with AI Plugins

Figma has long become the standard for cross-platform design, and with the advent of AI plugins, its capabilities have multiplied. Integration of computer vision allows analyzing layouts, identifying weaknesses, automatically selecting colors and fonts, and generating interfaces on the fly.
Pros and Cons of Figma

Advantages of Figma with AI plugins:
- Simplicity of integration into the existing process.
- Large community and regular updates.
- Real-time team collaboration capability.
Limitations:
- Some AI functions are only available through third-party plugins, requiring additional setup.
- For complex analytics, external services may sometimes be needed.
Who is Figma Suitable For

Figma with AI plugins is ideal for teams working on cross-platform products, where speed and design consistency are important. We recommend this tool for UX researchers, designers, and product managers who want to quickly implement innovations and control interface quality at every stage.
Fronty

Fronty is a tool that makes visual design as accessible as possible through neural networks. It allows uploading images or layouts, which AI automatically converts into responsive HTML/CSS code. In the context of Ukrainian realities, Fronty is especially useful for small businesses looking to quickly launch a site with minimal expenses.
Pros and Cons of Fronty

Pros:
- Fast code generation from visual layouts.
- Ease of use even for beginners.
- Integration capability with popular CMS and platforms.
Cons:
- Limited flexibility for complex projects.
- Full control over details sometimes requires manual adjustments.
Who is Fronty Suitable For

Fronty is an excellent choice for interactive and people-centered design, where speed and simplicity are key. For working with neural networks, a designer only needs basic knowledge in UI/UX and an understanding of generative design principles. We recommend this tool for those who want to quickly test an idea or launch a landing without involving a large team.
Comparison of Neural Networks for UI/UX Design

| Platform | Features | Automation | Personalization | Integration | Suitable For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craftum AI | Generative design, quick layouts | Yes | Partially | Yes | Designers, marketers, SMB |
| Uizard | GAN, UX analysis, rapid prototypes | Yes | Partially | Yes | UX analysts, product teams |
| Framer | Machine learning, adaptability | Yes | Yes | Yes | Innovative companies, startups |
| Figma + AI plugins | Computer vision, UX research | Yes | Partially | Yes | Cross-team work |
| Fronty | Visual design, code generation | Yes | No | Yes | Small business, startups |
Conclusion











